Tag Archives: Startups

1980s Softcore Videogames, Crystal Meth, and User Testing

By http://hg101.classicgaming.gamespy.com/lsl/lsl.htm / Gamespy. The image may also be obtained from //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sierra_On-Line/ Sierra On-Line, Fair useLeisure Suit Larry was a somewhat racy graphic adventure released in 1987. I never played it—I wasn’t even aware of its existence until years later. Recently I learned that it was a huge hit, not only because of its risqué content, but because it was actually a good game. Its author attributes this to the fact that it was the first game the publisher ever ran through user testing.

Most app developers I know don’t do user testing, either. And then they wonder why they have no customers.

Dumb Excuses for Not Testing

The Man With the Yellow Hat https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yellow_Hat.jpg Fair Use

Did this man take my laptop?

As I said in my last post, my laptop was stolen while I was performing coffee shop user testing for a client. I didn’t actually say define ‘user testing’, so here we go: you ask people to try your app, then you see if they can figure it out, and if it solves their problem.

Here are the excuses I get for not doing it:

What could I possibly learn?
I get this all the time. Some entrepreneurs are so sure of their Grand Vision for the Future that they don’t believe they can learn anything from users.
That doesn’t sound very scientific.
It isn’t. Qualitative research identifies problems; quantitative research measures them.
What do you have against data? Let’s do a survey.
You’ll get plenty of data when you launch, and it’ll be way more relevant than survey data. But you will learn different things from user testing.
I don’t want to delay the launch to do user testing.
So do it after launch. Unless you’re planning to do a big marketing splash to coincide with go-live—and you probably shouldn’t—this is fine.
I am afraid that people will hate it.
OK, nobody says this, but it’s what they’re thinking.
You’ve convinced me. Let’s do this the right way.
Nope: let’s half-ass it instead. Performing user testing at a coffee shop implies that you’re not that particular about who is participating, and that your main focus is on ensuring that it actually gets done and doesn’t become this bizarro never-ending project of its own. (If you work for a giant corporation, then go ahead and do this stuff. For you, eking out small improvements can yield big dividends, and the cost of a mistake is huge. For entrepreneurs, speed is paramount.)

Eight User Testing Tips

I’ve had my picture taken over a dozen times while I’m testing. A college professor uses an image of me in his class. Tourists laugh and say, “Only in San Francisco!” Yelp’s offices overlook the café where I set up shop, and they sent a member of their product team down to investigate what was going on. (Yes, I made her take the test.) So I’ve done enough user testing that I feel comfortable sharing some advice:

uat_sign

The sign I taped to my chair

  1. Write a script. If you try to wing it, you’re wasting everyone’s time. Test it with two people outside of your organization.
  2. If what users type into the device—not just their comments—is important, then instrument the app so you can collect their data without looking over their shoulders.
  3. Find a local coffee shop with decent foot traffic. Family-run ones are best: you want one where the person behind the counter can make the decision. (If you go to Starbucks, they’ll give you a little card with the number for their Intergalactic HQ.) Once you find a place, go there every time. Sometimes prospective testers don’t have time the first time they see you, but they’ll look for you next visit.
  4. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crystal_Meth.jpg

    I’ve tested with people who were on meth. If they can understand your app, you know it’s easy to use.

    Offer money. $10 for 10 minutes is far more compelling than $20 for 20, so break your testing into small chunks. Lots of people will do it just for the money, and that’s OK.
  5. Tell them that you don’t care if they like the app or not. I like to say that I’m testing it for a friend.
  6. Ten people is enough. I know this sounds ridiculously small, but by the time you talk to the last person, you should be hearing the same complaints over and over. That means it’s time to stop testing and go fix things.
  7. If it’s below 65 F, it is too cold for San Franciscans to be outside.
  8. Nobody wants to go first: people would walk up to me, get nervous, and back away. I am always very thankful for the people who volunteer. By the time they finish, someone else is inevitably waiting.

Done Is Better Than Perfect

I’m a big believer in strategy-focused product development. Part of that entails being laser-focused on who your customers are (and are not). So how can I recommend something as sloppy as coffee shop user testing, where you’re profoundly unconcerned with the demographic of your testers?

Because the alternative for entrepreneurs is usually not doing it at all. Someday you’ll be big enough to worry about getting users in the right demo, but that time is not before you launch.

Tagged , , ,

I Have a New Job

I’m thrilled to announce that I’ve joined instaGrok. This post is long overdue—I came aboard a few months back—but I remain awed by the possibilities of what we’re doing, and the grind of Getting Things Done hasn’t taken that away.

What does instaGrok do?

instaGrok is a research engine for learning and sharing: Users explore graphical concept maps that show how ideas connect. They can also customize the maps (with key facts, links, and images) and pass them on to friends. As Pinterest changed how we curate and share photos, instaGrok will do the same for what we learn.

For those of you who are mathematically inclined:

instaGrok =
(Google – Links + Concept Maps) *
(Pinterest – “Keep Calm and Carry On”)

So it’s not a search engine?

Nope. Search engines just give you links, so it’s up to you to read a bunch of pages and figure out how concepts relate. instaGrok scans all the pages you would’ve gotten as search results, and then it builds a concept map of the important ideas.

Can I try it out?

Sure. It’s open to the public, and we’re getting tons of users. Here’s a concept map on the American Dream that I made in a minute or so.

Who is it for?

K-12 education is our first market. However, we think instaGrok will be useful for everybody who uses the internet to learn (a.k.a. all of us).

Doesn’t Wikipedia cover this?

We respectfully disagree:

  • Wikipedia is linear. There’s no adaptivity or interactivity. You can’t zoom in to focus on a particular topic.
  • Wikipedia doesn’t know if you’re a beginner or an expert. Check out the introduction to the article on Gravity.Curvature of spacetime“, anyone?
  • You can’t customize a Wikipedia entry and pass it on to a friend, saying, “Here is what I think is important about this topic.”

What’s your role?

We’re a small team, and inevitably everyone does a little bit of everything. Somehow that ends up being terribly unglamorous.

Awesome! How can I help?

  1. Try it out.
  2. Tell us what you think.
  3. Tell your friends—especially friends who are educators—and help spread the word.
Tagged

If You’re Reading This, You Don’t Know Jack About Incubators

Dear reader, if you are viewing this blog post, chances are good that some variation of the following scenario played out recently:

  1. You told me about your startup.
  2. I asked if you considered joining an incubator.
  3. You badmouthed incubators.
  4. I was too buzzed to talk through it then, so I suggested that you read this post.

Since I closed down my company, I’ve attended several “networking events” at local bars. In case you want to steer clear of me, my nametag usually looks like this:

Even in the Bay area, I’m amazed to run into so many people who doubt that joining an incubator will help their business. If this applies to you, one of the following is true:

  1. You’re a rock star.
  2. You weighed the pros and cons, then concluded your business doesn’t fit the incubator model.
  3. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

Just in case you fall into category #3, allow me to assist.

The Benefits

  • Getting accepted is difficult. For a Tier 1 or 2 incubator, the odds are worse than getting into the Ivy League. Of course, most applicants have no serious shot–sort of like a highly selective college–so it’s not as daunting as it looks. The upshot is that being accepted is a proof point by itself. To an investor, you’ve already been vetted.
  • It’s a great alumni network. Let’s be honest: your startup is probably going to fail. Most do. Mine did, and it was way better than yours. Since you’re unlikely to get rich off of this idea, why not hang out with people who will?
  • The 5 or 6% an incubator takes is non-dilutive capital. Forget the money they provide: that’s trivial. Hanging out with really smart people for 3 months is going to increase the value of your company by far more than 5%.
  • You get to know your cofounders really well. In my case, we moved across the country, rented a house together, and managed to not murder each other. That’s called chemistry, my friends.

Weird Stuff That’s Not Immediately Obvious

  • Incubators work best for businesses where substantial progress can be made in 12 weeks. If you have a long sales cycle, or if your app requires a year to build, you’re not a great candidate.
  • Simpler businesses work better. Nuance doesn’t fly when you have 2-4 minutes to present on Demo Day.
  • Speedometer > odometer. This car has lots of miles, but it’s not going anywhere.

    Joining an incubator is a corporate reboot, and being a more mature company isn’t necessarily helpful. Growth rate trumps traction.
  • Incubators are getting huge, and some are specializing in either a vertical or a geography. Not surprisingly, the former (for instance, here and here) makes more sense to me. YMMV.
  • Some animals are more equal than others. Let’s pick on YC for a second: 3 companies are responsible for the overwhelming majority of YC’s success. If I were running an incubator, I’d place my bets early, and I’d spent most of my time working on the home runs. This isn’t the end of the world for the base hits, however: it just means that the next step will be more work.
  • Some of us needed a little help to get through Demo Day.

    Voilà: you’re now a stage actor. While speaking in front of +/- 1000 people is an interesting talent, so is hacky sack. They’re equally applicable to growing a business.
  • The whole “We’ll accept a team without an idea” thing is crazy talk. Yes, some startups change their ideas. But there’s a big difference between having the wrong idea and having no idea. Plus, the whole thing is too Pygmalion and Galatea for me.

My Personal Experience

As I mentioned, we shut down our company, so the result was not what we hoped it would be. But one should never conflate correct decisions with good outcomes, and joining Imagine K12 was the right call. If I had a time machine, I’d do it a thousand times over.

TL;DR version

    1. An incubator will likely help your company, so you should apply.
    2. But don’t sweat it: you probably won’t get in.
Tagged , , , ,

A Grand Unified Theory for Naming Websites

My old domain lives here.

Several weeks ago I found myself wanting to share some thoughts on a topic, and I realized it was finally time for me to get my own site; my hop onto the blogging bandwagon was seven years overdue. (Or perhaps a little early: I last had a personal website in the late 90s, and it was an eerily close approximation of today’s standard blog format. It may have looked ridiculously amateurish, however. Some Googling indicates that the name was taken over by a restaurant in Belize.)

While I have plenty of URLs lying around–many were purchased during bouts of insomnia for projects that looked significantly less brilliant the next morning—none of them seemed appropriate. It was time to pick something new. Plus, naming things is a blast.

What I was looking for

Rather than dive right in and register something, I first established my criteria.

  1. It should tell people how to feel. We all promote an image of ourselves to help shape what people think about us. While this certainly isn’t a professional site, it’s not exactly personal, either: I was searching for something timeless, something a little nerdy-cool but not hip, and something that shows I don’t take myself too seriously.
  2. It should be a good domain. That is, it should be easy to say, easy to spell, and easy to remember. No puns and no swapped/missing/duplicated letters.
  3. It should be available. I’m cheap, and my religion prohibits me from buying already-registered domains.
  4. It should be simple to illustrate. I’m not an artist, so I wanted to use preexisting images. And since I like money, I wanted to use ones in the public domain. It had to be easy to construct a site that wouldn’t embarrass me and my hypothetical future children.

The results

Hey kids! ReflexFurnace.com is still available!

It’s 2012, so pretty much any English word is long gone. I’m either inventing a new word, disemvoweling something (yuck), or choosing a compound word. I like door number 3, which meant it was time to come up with some themes, root words, prefixes, suffixes, and whatnot. After much abuse of Whois and crossing off everything Robotech-related, I came up with Sputnik 11. It immediately felt right, and five minutes later, it was mine.

  • Everyone thinks they know what Sputnik is, but this name lets me share the history of Sputnik 11.
  • The name evokes a nostalgia for a future that never was. Sputnik makes people smile. Based on the success of Mad Men, so does this entire era.
  • Those of you familiar with my background know my affection for the number 11. The ‘Eleven Learning’ name was a conversation starter, and our users loved it.

Several years ago a coworker of mine declared that anyone whose email address contained a number was just lazy. Her statement was aimed directly at me. I’ll have to ask her what she thinks of URLs with numbers in them.

I am sick of startups with terrible names

This is my plea: if you’re picking a URL—even if it’s for something as inconsequential as the site you’re reading now—have a process. Hell, you could do worse than using mine.

  1. It should tell people how to feel. Don’t recycle one you already have. Don’t choose something at random. Pick it because your audience will like it, not because you do.
  2. It should be a good domain. This reminds me of how I once talked myself out of a sure-thing consulting gig by pointing out that prospective users wouldn’t know how to spell the URL…
  3. It should be available. This is a no-brainer for a vanity blog, but it’s also true for startups. I die a little when I hear about companies that spend half their cash on a domain. And by the time a fancy domain is in their budget, their current name will have so much traction that they shouldn’t change. (The exception is when people call a site by something other than its URL, like thefacebook.com or twttr.com.)
  4. It should be simple to illustrate. OK, maybe this one just applies to me.

“We came across the word ‘twitter’, and it was just perfect. The definition was ‘a short burst of inconsequential information,’ and ‘chirps from birds’. And that’s exactly what the product was.”
Jack Dorsey

Next up

Time to pick obnoxious hipster names for those hypothetical kids.

Tagged , ,